Tag Archive for: PACE in the News

Understanding and Addressing Nursing Home Staffing Issues: A Guide for Long-Term Care Ombudsmen

This article was originally published on Long Term Care Community Coalition.

The Long Term Care Community Coalition (LTCCC) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving care and quality of life in nursing homes and assisted living. Visit www.nursinghome411.org for a wide range of free resources including our Dementia Care Toolkits, Nursing Home Data Center, Fact Sheets on nursing home care standards, Abuse, Neglect, and Crime Reporting Center, and Family Resource Center.

Visit www.nursinghome411.org/staffing-resource-center/ for links to staffing data, practical tools for advocacy, and more information on the expected staffing methodology.

Read the full guide here.

Analysis: PACE cuts institutionalization among older adults, needs more equitable access

This article was originally published on McKnights Long-Term Care News.

The federal Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) has demonstrated effectiveness in improving care coordination and reducing institutionalization among older adults but also requires improvements in equity and justice. That is according to a March policy analysis published in the Journal of Advanced Nursing.

“Through fully capitated financing and interdisciplinary service delivery, PACE enables older adults to remain at home, maintain autonomy, and receive coordinated, high-quality care,” authors said. “However, PACE’s transformative potential remains constrained by geographic inequities, exclusionary eligibility criteria, workforce instability and financing misalignments.”

The analysis, conducted between May and July 2025, used a dual-framework approach to examine PACE structure, implementation and outcomes across four policy levels: efficacy, effectiveness, equity and justice. Data was derived from peer-reviewed research, federal and state policy documents, organizational reports from the National PACE Association and advocacy groups, comparative analyses and international literature.

The analysis characterized the PACE program as promoting continuous nurse–patient interaction across care settings, which helps reduce care fragmentation associated with fee-for-service models. Additionally, participation in the program was linked to fewer hospitalizations and emergency department visits as well as longevity in the community before institutionalization.

Some shortcomings of PACE identified in the analysis include a limited geographic reach, racial and ethnic disparities in enrollment, exclusion of Medicare-only populations and persistent nursing workforce shortages. Authors note that the program serves about 56,000 participants as of 2024, which is less than 0.5% of potentially eligible older adults. They assert that the lack of universal long-term care in the United States contributes to this, where PACE access is contingent on dual eligibility and geographic availability.

Authors also highlight that PACE’s Medicare capitation rates average 20% more per beneficiary than comparable Medicare Advantage plans, suggesting concerns about resource allocation and efficiency. They point out that, by 2022, 78% of PACE enrollees remained in nonprofit PACE programs, which suggests that ownership diversification has not enhanced scalability.

Magical Outcomes: The Case for Launching PACE

This article was originally published on Hospice News.

Programs for All-Inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE) are extremely challenging to establish. Nevertheless, more hospices are other health care providers are investing in the model due to the positive outcomes participants are seeing.

The Medicare Advantage and health care provider SCAN Group, parent company of SCAN Health Plan, operates the PACE organization myPlace Health. SCAN Group incubated myPlace Health since its inception, initially in partnership with Commonwealth Care Alliance (CCA). Last Spring, SCAN bought out CCA to assume total ownership of the PACE company. The company now operates two PACE programs based in California.

Hospice News caught up with Robert Pottharst, CEO of myPlace Health, to discuss the benefits of the PACE model and what it takes to establish a program.

What does it take to set up a PACE program?

Of all of the complex care, integrated care, value-based care models I’ve ever worked in, this has been by far the toughest.

Securing a PACE contract from a state is difficult or sometimes impossible. It depends on the state, and is often highly competitive with a whole host of different players.

Second is capital intensity. You’re looking at multiple millions, upwards of $10 million, if you want to go bigger, just to launch a single market. And then the actual site development and construction is highly complex. It’s rare to find something that’s truly PACE ready.

If you can get past all of those, you’ve got a next set of challenges. One is growth. It is difficult to find and engage PACE eligibles because of the strict eligibility criteria and a population that, right now, generally, has no reason to trust the system. PACE, typically, is in competition with the insurers, the Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans, also the providers, usually primary care if they delete their [primary care provider (PCP)] to join you.

Next, you’re up against high regulatory complexity. It’s arguably one of the most regulatory complex models in U.S. health care. Then, there is the operational complexity of running what is like several businesses at once. You’re a health plan; you’re a medical group; you’re an adult day center; you’re a transport agency; you’re a home care agency, and any of the other things you tack on. And all of those have to be working in unison. On top of that, you’re managing the total cost of care risk for a very clinically and socially complex disabled population, which is just super hard.

So, if you get all of that right, that’s just one market, and there’s additional complexity executing this model with consistent success across different markets and geographies. So, that’s what’s hard about this. It’s literally all the things, and it comes down to people, technology, culture and workflow. The hurdles aren’t insurmountable, but in order to be able to do this over and over, over time, it takes some true missionaries who are in this really to change lives, not to just make a buck at the end of the day.

If it’s so difficult, why are people doing it?

Because the outcomes are magical. When this all works together, it is one of the best shining examples of value-based care in all health care. This is the “OG” of value-based care. It was value-based care before there was even a term. So, when it all works together, it is a step towards change in health outcomes, quality and experience for these people who are some of the most vulnerable in our society. The halo effect extends to their families and the communities, too. So, it’s worth it. It is totally worth it.

You said the process for getting a contract with the state is highly competitive. Is there kind of a boom happening in the PACE space right now, or what’s that market like?

There’s growth in existing contracts, but we still don’t have PACE available in every state. I think it’s 34 to 35 states today that offer PACE. But even in those states that have PACE, it doesn’t mean it’s statewide. Take a state like Texas, which should have a massive PACE opportunity. They only have it in El Paso and Lubbock and Amarillo. None of the big cities.

California just passed a two-year moratorium on new PACE applications. So, we’re up against the bottleneck here with the states that ultimately control the pace of growth. One would think that you would want to enroll as many [beneficiaries] in PACE as possible, given the cost benefit to the state, but the complexity of the programs presents a challenge.

What’s unique about the SCAN model when it comes to PACE?

The way we’ve integrated with SCAN Health Plan, their MA plan, is quite unique. PACE is essentially an HMO, [with] any of the capabilities that come with building a specialized HMO around PACE. We have tons of expertise to pull from. We’re able to develop networks around their preferred partners. We’re able to go to market with our community-based organization partners together as well. So, there’s actually quite a lot of synergy if done right.

The second thrust is the clinical model itself. When we launched myPlace Health, we saw an opportunity to modernize the PACE model. It’s been around for 40 years, but we found that some of the more modern and proven advancements in geriatrics aren’t uniformly included in PACE programs nationwide. This includes the way we integrate behavioral health, the way we integrate clinical pharmacy, the way we’ve developed workflow and culture that is truly proactive, value-based care. These are things that we’ve kind of imported from other parts of the industry into our clinical model.

What services do your PACE participants receive? You’ve mentioned a few of them.

We have primary care. So, first off, all of the coverages that you would receive in your MA or Medicaid health plan are covered. So, we have a network of specialists, you name it. Next, we offer physical and occupational therapy, behavioral health on site, a whole host of adult day programming, including the transportation to and from the center and to the clinic, as well as the activities that come with the day center. We have social work and dietitians as a big part of this, not only food delivered in the center, but also at home. So, a ton under the hood, and a bunch contracted with us as well.

Does the PACE program provide any kind of palliative care?

We do, in fact. So, if you think of the discipline of palliative care and the type of services that are provided under a Medicare palliative care benefit, we provide all those services. We serve people all the way through the end of life.

Advance care directives and advanced care planning are a major component of our onboarding and ongoing conversations.

How similar is your end-of-life care to the traditional hospice model? Is it delivered in the home? How different are the two?

In some cases, it can be quite the same. We even contract with and also have our own palliative care trained staff. But it anchors back to what matters most to the participant. What matters most to them is receiving services in the home with their family. We anchor on that. If there are other issues where they want to be more aggressive about treatment in an institutional setting, that’s what we try to do. But it is anchored back to what matters most to them.

House Passage of Bill to Provide Veterans Improved Healthcare and Benefits Will Increase Access to PACE

This article was originally published on NPA Online.

WASHINGTON, DC – November 18, 2023 – The National PACE Association (NPA) today said that the U.S. House of Representatives’ passage of the Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Act will give veterans increased access to the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly across the nation.

“NPA applauds the definitive action of the U.S. House of Representatives to dramatically increase the ability of veterans to enroll in local Programs of All-Inclusive Care (PACE) through their VA benefits and age in place. We are pleased Congress has recognized that older veterans with VA health benefits should have the same access to home and community-based services, such as PACE, as other seniors,” said Shawn Bloom, president and CEO of NPA.”

Bloom added, “NPA commends the efforts of House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Mike Bost (R-IL12), House Veterans’ Affairs Committee Ranking Member Mark Takano (D-CA39), Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Chairman Jon Tester (D-MT) and Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Ranking Member Jerry Moran (R-KS) to work together on compromise language so the bill could move forward in the 118th Congress. Further, we strongly urge the Senate to take the Dole Act up swiftly in the coming days.”

Under current law not every eligible enrolled veteran has ready access to HCBS and PACE in particular. A section of this bill, sponsored by Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ6), would ensure that any veteran with U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care benefits, who is eligible for and needs home and community-based services (HCBS), including long term care services and supports (LTSS), would be able to receive such care and services at home, including through (PACE).

Providing care at home and in the community not only enhances the quality of life for veterans, their families and their caregivers, but also reduces VA health expenditures. Generally, the cost of HCBS is notably less than institutional care. Further, the VA has found that the use of HCBS creates additional savings by either delaying admission to a nursing home or avoiding such an admission altogether as well as lowering the risk of preventable hospitalizations.

“Our nation has a duty to our veterans to provide them with the best care possible through their VA health benefits, and PACE is proven to provide high quality care and reduce caregiver burden while being cost-efficient. NPA’s member PACE organizations always have been proud

to serve veterans and are eager to help more receive needed care in their preferred setting – their homes and communities. We congratulate Congress for the changes this bill will make and look forward to continuing to work with them so that all older adults will have affordable access to PACE,” Bloom stated.

The National PACE Association (NPA) works to advance the efforts of PACE programs, which coordinate and provide preventive, primary, acute and long-term care services so older individuals can continue living in the community. The PACE model of care is centered on the belief that it is better for the well-being of seniors with chronic care needs and their families to be served in the community whenever possible. For more information, visit www.NPAonline.org and follow @TweetNPA.

Pay For What Matters To Patients: A Whole Health Population-Based Payment Approach

This article was originally posted on Health Affairs. Read the full article here.

While value-based purchasing (VBP) programs have proliferated in the past two decades, quality measures have become increasingly important as they are employed to calculate the “value” of care. The health care industry, however, is struggling with a quality measurement dilemma. On the one hand, as the number of measures is increasing rapidly, health care organizations—both payers and providers—are investing significant resources and time in data collection and reporting of measure results. One recent study reported that a single hospital spent more than $5 million, along with an additional expenditure of more than half a million dollars in vendor fees, for the preparation and report of 162 unique quality metrics in a single calendar year. On the other hand, despite these efforts and investment, recent evidence of quality improvement is mixed. As seen in the case of chronic conditions such as diabetes, despite the adoption of numerous discrete diabetes care measures, diabetes-related outcomes such as lower extremity amputation are still far from being optimal. This raises questions about whether we are measuring and incentivizing the right drivers of health. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) Innovation Center’s synthesis review of their 30 payment models launched in the past decade, most of the models did not demonstrate consistent and significant improvements in quality.

In response, CMS recently announced a new strategy, the Universal Foundation, to scale back to a core set of just about twenty quality measures and align them across programs. While this approach is laudable, there are already questions about an excessive focus on disease-focused measures and plan-level measures, applicability to different specialties, testing of new models, and their alignment between programs.

The central question is: What is the most crucial aspect of “value” of care that we can measure for value-based arrangements without needing an excessive number of quality measures or risking too few? Michael Chernew and Mary Beth Landrum suggested a targeted supplemental data collection approach, in which only low performers of a core set of metrics would be required to provide additional data on other measures, reducing costs while avoiding gaps in a core measure set. Michael McWilliams proposed other strategies that focus on physicians’ intrinsic motivation and professionalism, without necessarily relying on quality measures. In this commentary, we propose a third approach: measuring what matters most to patients from a whole health perspective.

 

Read the full article here.

A More Humane Model for Eldercare in the U.S.

This article was originally posted on Harvard Business Review. Read the full article here.

The U.S. health care system is not set up to improve the quality of life of the most vulnerable, chronically ill, elderly people, especially those who are poor. Older poor people often face loneliness, depression, a lost sense of purpose, and an inability to live independently in their homes. They also encounter many health service hurdles, including inadequate care coordination, fee-for-service reimbursement that often reflexively encourages medical treatment over other forms of care, and a dysfunctional nursing home industry.

To help improve services for these patients, we analyzed the design and implementation of a national program called PACE: Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly. We focused on this program because all PACE participants are vulnerable: They require nursing home–level care, and 90% are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. Few integrated-care programs serve this dual-eligible population, which now numbers 12.5 million Americans.

In-depth interviews with PACE staff and program participants conducted by two of us (Len Berry and Sunjay Letchuman); collaborations with PACE leaders, including two coauthors of this article (Mary Kummer Naber and Peter Fitzgerald); and our collective analysis of the features and daily operations of a PACE model in southeastern Michigan (led by Mary) reveal how PACE successfully delivers individualized, home-centered care to poor older adults while lowering overall costs. Given that PACE currently serves only about 60,000 of these patients, expanding the program has useful management and cost implications for health care systems nationally. Although nursing home and other institutionalized elder care clearly demand improvement, the United States also must invest in reimagining what elder care can be. PACE provides a roadmap.

More Comprehensive, Less Costly Care

The PACE program, first developed in San Francisco in 1973, is a comprehensive, integrated, community-based care model that lets older adults continue to live at home as long as possible. There are now 150 PACE programs in 32 states. The basic philosophy is that care should include what matters most to older poor people: all-inclusive care comprising nutrition, social interaction, transportation, and home upkeep, in addition to medical and related services. The goal is to treat patients with dignity as they safely live at home, rather than in an institution, and receive every needed service from one entity — all while lowering costs.

All Medicare beneficiaries needing nursing home–level care but wishing to live at home are eligible for PACE. However, Medicare beneficiaries who do not meet their state’s Medicaid income requirement are required to pay an amount equivalent to the monthly Medicaid payment, limiting access to millions of seniors who could benefit from the program.

The program offers patients (called “participants”) all their Medicare- and Medicaid-covered benefits, including primary care, adult day care, rehabilitative care, and meals at a local PACE center. PACE provides transportation and various in-home services and is the payer for medical care that it cannot offer internally, such as emergency room visits and hospital stays. PACE organizations are paid on a monthly, risk-adjusted, capitated basis by Medicare and Medicaid, meaning they are paid a set amount per month based, in part, on participants’ medical complexity. PACE programs bear full financial risk for all care, and participants do not pay anything out of pocket.

Available evidence shows that PACE reduces health care utilization and costs. Compared with similar populations, PACE participants have substantially lower rates of hospitalization (539 vs. 962 admissions per 1,000 person-years). South Carolina, for example, annually saves nearly $9,000 per PACE participant compared with residents in alternative long-term care settings such as nursing homes; Wyoming saves over $12,000 per PACE participant. However, PACE is about far more than saving money — it is about restoring dignity and joy to people’s lives.

An Exemplary Model

One outstanding PACE program is PACE Southeast Michigan (PACE SEMI), which the National PACE Association identified as a “bright spot” for its growth and quality metrics. PACE SEMI is organized as a tax-exempt nonprofit and is owned by Henry Ford Health (55%) and Presbyterian Villages of Michigan (45%). With seven centers serving 1,600 participants and employing 700 people, PACE SEMI increases its net enrollment by an average of 30 participants each month, compared with two participants each month in PACE centers nationally. Approximately 15% of PACE SEMI participants visit an emergency room each year for any reason, compared with 25% of PACE participants nationally and 31% of Medicare Advantage enrollees. PACE SEMI participants also use inpatient hospital services less frequently: In 2019, PACE SEMI participants had 302 fewer hospitalizations per 1,000 persons compared to Medicare Advantage enrollees.

The PACE model is built on interdisciplinary teamwork. All PACE SEMI staff members are expected to see themselves as physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual “healers.” They include the primary care doctor who emphasizes preventing illness and injury as much as ordering treatments, the nurse and social worker who coordinate care, the onsite pharmacist who stays alert for prescribed drugs that may do more harm than good for specific patients, the kitchen chef who customizes meals to participants’ tastes and allergies, the participant-care associate who gives supportive care for daily activities (including showers), and the drivers who transport participants to and from PACE centers and other important destinations.

Unlike some PACE programs, PACE SEMI has behavioral health and spiritual care specialists at each center who get to know each participant they serve. In one case mentioned by a PACE physician, a spiritual care provider asked clinic staff to immediately check on a patient who seemed “off.” It turned out the patient was having a stroke and quickly received life-saving care. In a less-dramatic case, a social worker took it upon herself to persuade a local Trader Joe’s store to donate flowers for participants to take home each week. Team members hold weekly meetings where everyone has equal input about how to prevent avoidable emergency room visits and advance the quality of life for their participants.

Whole-Person Care

At its core, the PACE model is relationship-based: Participants and staff members know each other well, which facilitates “whole-person healing” customized to each individual. Indeed, members are called “participants” precisely because of their active role in planning their care, which goes far beyond medical services and addresses head-on the isolation that many older people who live alone endure.

A day at a PACE SEMI center includes needed medical and rehabilitative services and is filled with customized activities such as music, painting, games, breakfast and lunch with friends, and regular group sessions where participants share “what I am grateful for,” cultivating a sense of belonging and community. Participants can get their hair shampooed, cut, and styled. They receive instruction on living safely at home and are given iPads (called “GrandPads”), designed for senior use, that let them easily contact family or PACE staff or play games. The kitchen prepares food for participants to take home at the end of the day. Participants can also use the onsite gym staffed with physical and occupational therapists. (“To see a 90-year-old working out is amazing,” one therapist said.)

“Dancing Kathy” arrived at PACE SEMI in a wheelchair. Aided by the rehabilitation staff, she eventually graduated to a walker and, months later, a cane. In an interview one year after starting at PACE, Kathy said she no longer needed the cane most of the time and could now dance. She then joined several staff members to dance the “Hustle” in front of the cafeteria lunch crowd.

Proactive Investments in Health

Most of the enormous amount spent on health care in the United States is reactive. Patients get sick, treatment ensues, costs are incurred. PACE shows the potential of investing in health, not just health care, proactively. PACE SEMI and other well-run PACE programs do just about anything to help people continue to live at home safely. For instance, if a participant needs a shower chair at home to prevent a fall, PACE SEMI buys the chair, sets it up, and teaches the participant how to use it. With money generated by community fundraising, PACE SEMI fixes porches and stairs, replaces heaters, improves lighting, and even roots out bedbugs. It partners with an ambulance service whose paramedics often provide in-home care that prevents ER visits.

Such spending can greatly improve the quality of people’s lives while reducing downstream costs. One of PACE SEMI’s participants, “Mr. B,” had a career as a musician but now lives alone. After leaving the PACE center each week, Mr. B was a frequent visitor to ERs for mental health–related issues and anxiety. After the PACE staff realized Mr. B was missing music in his life, the center bought him a headset and player so he could listen to his favorite music. The ER visits stopped.

Service with a Soul

PACE SEMI’s secret sauce is its culture. Hiring for caring, not just competence, is as central as intensively training staff to distinguish between nonmedical healing and medical interventions. Some staff members with traditional health care backgrounds must “unlearn” their bias for episodic care. And in working with a vulnerable population, staff must move beyond risk aversion, common in institutional elder care.

Keeping people safe does not require stealing their freedom, as Atul Gawande discussed in Being Mortal: “…our elderly are left with a controlled and supervised institutional existence, a medically designed answer to unfixable problems, a life designed to be safe but empty of anything they care about.” With creativity, compassion, and commitment, a carefully selected, well-trained staff who are themselves treated with dignity can instill dignity, a sense of belonging, and even joy in PACE participants. As Renee, a food service worker at PACE SEMI, puts it, “We add love to the food.”

PACE is about investing in people’s well-being, keeping them as well as possible for as long as possible. It offers older adults the chance to live at home with a higher quality of care — and of life. The current model serves primarily low-income seniors; however, the bigger opportunity is to expand it to include all chronically ill older adults. Such models will be useful as Congress crafts legislation to expand PACE, as health care organizations plan how to launch PACE programs efficiently and effectively, and as program leaders and managers seek to develop the nuts and bolts of care that offers healing to patients and energizes staff.

 

PACE gains speed as states seek nursing home alternatives

This article was originally posted on Modern Healthcare. Read the full article here.

A little-known program to keep low-income seniors out of nursing homes is getting a shot in the arm.